Painting invoices in pre-1978 rentals: the record the photo can’t show

A painter’s invoice arrives after a turnover in a building put up in 1962: “scrape and patch, prime, two coats, living room and two bedrooms”. Attached are a photo of peeling trim and a photo of a clean, bright wall. The work may be exactly as billed. But a freshly painted wall looks the same whether the old paint was scraped inside plastic sheeting and cleaned up properly or sanded in the open and swept into a corner. In housing built before 1978, that difference is what a federal rule is about, and the rule gives you a better document than any photo. This piece covers what the photos and the paperwork can show, what they can’t, and the checks. It is not legal advice.

The rule, in the parts we read

The EPA’s Renovation, Repair and Painting rule (40 CFR part 745, subpart E) says firms that disturb lead-based paint in homes, child care facilities and kindergartens built before 1978 “must be EPA- or state-certified and must use certified renovators”. The EPA’s own page adds that this “includes in-house maintenance staff and many types of outside contractors”. So it can apply to your own maintenance team, not only the painter you hire.

Not every paint job counts. The rule defines a renovation as work that “results in the disturbance of painted surfaces”, so scraping, sanding and cutting out patches are the point, not a new coat over sound paint. It also excludes “minor repair and maintenance activities”: work that disturbs “6 square feet or less of painted surface per room” inside, or 20 square feet or less outside, as long as none of the restricted practices are used and the job is not window replacement or demolition. Jobs in the same room within 30 days count as one job, so a large job split into small invoices does not fall under the line. And the rule doesn’t apply where a certified inspector or a test has documented that the components being worked on are below the lead threshold.

The paperwork the firm has to hand over

This is the part most useful to a property manager checking an invoice. Section 745.86 says the renovation firm must keep its records for three years after the job. Those records include documentation that a certified renovator was assigned to the project, that warning signs were posted, how the work area was contained, how waste was contained, and the post-renovation cleaning and the renovator’s cleaning verification.

And the firm doesn’t just keep it. By the time it delivers the final invoice, or within 30 days of finishing if that comes first, it “must provide information pertaining to compliance with this subpart” to the building owner and, if different, to an adult occupant of the unit. If a covered painting invoice in a pre-1978 unit arrives with no compliance record at all, that is a question to ask before you pay, whatever the photos look like.

If the unit is occupied when the work happens, there is an earlier record too. No more than 60 days before starting, the firm has to give the owner and an adult occupant the EPA’s lead pamphlet, and get a signed acknowledgment or a certificate of mailing at least 7 days before the work.

What the photos can show

• That the surface needed work. A “before” photo of peeling or chipped paint shows the condition someone saw. In an older building it also shows paint that was likely to be disturbed.
• That walls are painted now. An “after” photo shows a finished surface and roughly its color and sheen.
• Sometimes containment. A photo taken during the job can show plastic sheeting on the floor, sealed doorways and a warning sign. That is worth asking for. It is still a picture of a moment, not a record of the whole job.
• Sometimes which unit and when. A unit number or a recognisable fixture ties the photo to a place. If the file still carries the camera’s own clock, the date should fall within the job.

What they can’t

• How the old paint was handled. The finished wall hides it. This is the whole problem.
• Whether a certified renovator was on the job. No photo shows a certificate in force. The compliance record should name who was assigned.
• That the cleanup was done or verified. Lead dust is not something a photo of a clean-looking floor can rule out.
• How much was painted. A photo of one wall says nothing about the other rooms on the invoice, or the number of coats.

Checks before you pay

1. Know the year the building went up. If it is before 1978, and the invoice describes scraping, sanding or patching beyond small spots, ask for the firm’s compliance record with the invoice, and a copy of its firm certification and the renovator’s.
2. Read the record against the invoice. The rooms, the dates and the renovator named in the record should match the job you were billed for.
3. Watch for split jobs. Several small invoices for the same room within 30 days are one job under the rule’s own counting.
4. Check quantities. Rooms, square footage, coats and paint bought should agree with each other. Paint receipts attached to invoices deserve their own look.
5. Ask for the original photo files, not pictures pasted into an invoice PDF, which have usually lost their camera record. Why, and how to ask for the originals.
6. Drop this job’s photos in with the painter’s earlier ones. The checker marks any two files in the same batch that are the same file, even under different names. A peeling-trim photo reused across units shows up that way. A new photo of a wall won’t, which is why the compliance record matters more than the picture.

Whether someone used AI on it

A picture of peeling paint or a freshly painted room is easy to generate now, and some generators write a mark into the file saying so. The checker reads those marks, and the notes some phone editors leave when generative AI was used to alter a photo. A file with no such mark is not proven real. Most fakes and most genuine photos look the same to a file reader once they have been through a chat app or a screenshot. And for this kind of job, even a perfectly genuine photo says nothing about how the old paint was handled.

The limits, stated plainly

• A photo of a painted wall shows a painted wall. It doesn’t show how the old paint came off, who was certified, or whether the cleanup was verified.
• A compliance record is a document the firm writes about its own work. It is much better than a photo for this question, but it is a record, not an inspection. If you need to know whether lead dust was left behind, that is a job for a certified professional, not a photo or a form.
• The rule quoted here is 40 CFR 745 subpart E (sections 745.82, 745.83, 745.84 and 745.86), read in October 2026 through a published copy of the regulation, plus the EPA’s own summary page. We quoted only the parts named here. There are other requirements and exemptions, and some states run the program themselves with rules of their own. We have not covered any state’s version, or what a landlord may charge a tenant for repainting. Check with your state program or the EPA before relying on this.
• A photo with no camera record is not a fake. Text messages, chat apps and many portals remove the record from genuine photos every day.
• Our checker gives no confidence score and does not judge a picture by looking at it. It reads what is in the file, in your browser, and uploads nothing. A file with no AI marker is not proven real.
• This is not legal advice.

Related: what a contractor’s “after” picture actually proves, and lock change invoices and the old key.

---

ImposterShield reads the evidence inside image and video files. It runs in your browser and uploads nothing. If a file has been stripped, it says so. If it has not read a file, it says that too.